How lame is the San Francisco Chronicle?

|
(5)

Pretty goddam lame.

Bruce Brugmann always says that the way to tell where a big-city daily newspaper stands is to look at its endorsements for mayor and United States Senate. And on Sept, 26, the Chronicle endorsed for United States Senate and said:

Man, we suck. In a race with a crystal-clear choice, we can't make up our minds. So we won't endorse either of them.

The Guardian's done a few "no endorements" too -- but only in races where an incumbent who's really bad is unopposed, or where the outcome is pretty much pre-determined and we want to make a statement. In a race like this, ducking the question is completely irresponsible. One of these two women is going to get elected to the United States Senate -- and the outcome of the vote will have major national significance. Make a choice, folks. The voters have to.

Stay tuned for our local and statewide endorsements issue, coming out October 6. Listen to our interviews with the candidates here.

Comments

Probably no worse that crossing a picket line of your own employees and then advocating for UNIONS when it doesn't apply to you...... fucking hilarious

Posted by Guest on Sep. 27, 2010 @ 6:42 pm

When did this happen?

Posted by Guest on Sep. 27, 2010 @ 8:58 pm

Like the Pete Wilson tax, the unionizing of the Guardian is an other issue from reality.

Posted by matlock on Sep. 27, 2010 @ 10:28 pm

WHERE ARE MY COMRADES, DEFENDING THE BG?

Posted by Guest on Sep. 28, 2010 @ 2:59 pm