Chronicle employees told to accept "substandard" contract

|
(1)
Just last year, Hearst threatened to shutter the Chronicle and made extensive layoffs.

After some tough talk about resisting a “substandard offer” from San Francisco Chronicle management, the California Media Workers Guild has decided to urge Chronicle workers to approve a new contract offer that is “essentially the same company proposal” that workers resoundingly rejected just last month. The vote is set for Dec. 13.

Guild representative and longtime Chronicle writer Carl Hall told the Guardian last week that “they basically stiff-armed us” and “refused to negotiate any compromise since October” in contract talks. “We see it as insulting, irresponsible corporate behavior given everything staff has done,” Hall told the Guardian last week.

He told us workers planned to rally against the Chronicle and enlist the help of the community, readers, and local labor leaders. “The company is just not listening, so we're going to have to get a louder voice to achieve that." The Guild's campaign included online testimonials from various Chronicle employees, including conservative columnist Debra Saunders, who began her missive by writing, “I am probably the last person Chronicle readers would expect to see standing up for a union.”

But since then, the Guild has essentially capitulated to management's demand for a status quo contract, arguing that it's the best they can get for now despite the 106-29 vote against that contract. “Since then, however, the economy has deteriorated even further, and other media companies in the Bay Area have announced fresh concession demands. At the Chronicle, many Guild members said they were ready to fight, but most recognized it would take some months to build up a potent campaign and public support,” the Guild wrote in a statement on its website. "Given those circumstances, the commitee decided it would be better to accept the current proposed changes -- and continue mobilizing in advance of the next round of talks."

Guardian calls to the Chronicle's Publisher's Office were not returned.

Comments

The Chron is losing around $60 million a year according to the Hearst Corp. I can't imagine Hearst letting that go on forever.

The unfortunate fact for the Chron employees is that we can all survive without the Chron. There are plenty of other news sources around, both in print and online, that can provide news. It isn't 1975 anymore. It would be sad to lose the local SF paper, but it has already lost half the readership it had in the 70s and 80s.

So, if the Chron staff were to go on strike I can imagine that would be the catalyst for Hearst to shut it down. There are no other journalism jobs out there for the then-unemployed Chron staff, so I would imagine many of them would end up in the 99-week unemployment check crowd.

The paper's unions no longer have any power to deprive us of news with a strike. But they do have the power to render themselves unemployed.

Posted by Scott on Dec. 09, 2010 @ 10:40 am